Peer-led intervention campaign against school bullying: who considered it useful, who benefited? (Updated)

This digest found in

What data were collected?

Pre-intervention information was gathered three days before the campaign and post-intervention data were gathered five weeks later by the use of questionnaires. The students were first given advice about what constituted bullying and the various forms that bullying could take. They were then asked to:

identify anyone (including themselves) who they considered was being bullied;
evaluate the extent to which they had witnessed different types of bullying, such as "physical bullying" or "verbal bullying";
explain their own attitudes to bullying; and, post-intervention,
evaluate the campaign.

There were twelve participating classes involving 196 children. To increase the reliability of the results only data from the 144 students who were present at both times of data collection were included.

Your path: Home > Welcome to The Research Informed Practice Site (TRIPS) > Themes > Inclusion > Peer-led intervention campaign against school bullying: who considered it useful, who benefited?WedMar171608022004 > What data were collected?
Research Home Themes \| Find digests \| About the digests resources glossary researchers contact TRIPS Introduction Why was the study carried out? What do we know about previous attempts to stop bullying? Targeting the bystanders? What were the main anti-bullying activities? What effects did the intervention have? What data were collected? Implications Where might I find more information? Send us your feedback Collated digests To view/remove/add notes and save your collated digests click here Get Word Reader Peer-led intervention campaign against school bullying: who considered it useful, who benefited? (Updated) This digest found in Gender Inclusion Send to a friend Word doc 80KB Printer friendly Collate for later What data were collected? Pre-intervention information was gathered three days before the campaign and post-intervention data were gathered five weeks later by the use of questionnaires. The students were first given advice about what constituted bullying and the various forms that bullying could take. They were then asked to: identify anyone (including themselves) who they considered was being bullied; evaluate the extent to which they had witnessed different types of bullying, such as "physical bullying" or "verbal bullying"; explain their own attitudes to bullying; and, post-intervention, evaluate the campaign. There were twelve participating classes involving 196 children. To increase the reliability of the results only data from the 144 students who were present at both times of data collection were included.