Full version

Can Instructional and Emotional support in the Key Stage 1 classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?

Introduction

Authors

Hamre, B. K. and Pianta, R. C. (2005) University of Virginia

Publisher

Child Development 76 (5), pp. 949-967

How can teachers effectively support pupils who are at risk of school failure?

Previous research has found that:

This study examined the ways in which everyday classroom processes may help alter the trajectories for pupils considered to be at risk of failing by considering a group of 910 pupils taken from 747 primary schools across the United States of America.

The researchers found that pupils identified as being at risk of school failure were more likely than other pupils to benefit from placement in classrooms offering high levels of teaching and emotional support, and that placement in high quality classrooms helped close the gap between these pupils and their low risk peers, particularly in the early grades.  The consistency of good teaching and emotional support was found to be critical to the success of the pupils.

Keywords:
USA; Key stage 1; Primary schools; Pupils; Classroom environment; Classroom management; Social skills; Individual needs; Inclusion; Whole class teaching.

How were pupils identified as being at risk of school failure?

The researchers identified pupils as being at risk of school failure if they showed one or both of two types of risk:

Demographic risk was defined prior to a child entering school and was based on family and other demographic factors thought to place pupils at a risk of school failure.  The researchers identified low maternal education as one of the most robust indicators of this risk as pupils were less likely to have been exposed to frequent and rich language and literacy stimulation in the home.  For the purpose of this study pupils were placed in the high demographic risk if their mother's level of education was less than a four year college degree (equivalent to A-levels in England).

Functional risk was recognised in pupils who demonstrated early difficulties with attention, behaviour, social skills and academic competence and was measured in the following ways:

Back to top^


What difference can instructional and emotional support make for pupils who are at risk of school failure?

The researchers found that pupils identified as being at risk of school failure at ages five and six on average displayed lower levels of achievement at age seven when compared with their low risk peers.

Researchers found that the achievement gap between pupils identified as being at risk of school failure and their peers reduced when:

The study found that pupils who were identified as having a high functional risk at ages five and six were more likely to develop poor relationships with their teachers and experience conflict than their peers by the time they were seven.   However when these pupils were part of a classroom which offered high levels of emotional support their experience of conflict was similar to that of their peers.

Back to top^


What took place in supportive classrooms?

School based prevention and intervention strategies increasingly aim to improve the social and emotional climate of classrooms in order to enhance pupils’ social and behavioural development. 

Classrooms were considered to offer high quality instructional support when:

Classrooms were considered to offer high emotional support when teachers:

Back to top^


How was the study designed?

This study followed pupils who had been identified at ages five and six as being at risk of school failure. The researchers examined whether the classroom environment to which they were exposed had made any difference to these risks by the time the children reached the age of seven.

Researchers examined the following outcomes:

The sample was a part of the National Institute for Health and Human Deveopment (NICHD) Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. The pupils’ mothers were recruited from hospitals during their pregnancy, and a random subgroup, of 1364 families, was selected to be involved in this study.  910 pupils for whom there was a complete set of data were included in the final sample and were spread across 747 different schools. The pupils in the sample were predominantly white, equally divided between girls and boys and did not come from economically deprived backgrounds. Of the sample:

In order to provide a robust test the researchers adjusted the data to take into account children’s scores at age 4 ½.

Back to top^


Implications

In completing this digest the authors began to ask the following questions about implications for practitioners:

Implication for teachers:

Implication for school leaders:

 

Implication for teachers:

Implication for school leaders:

Back to top^


Where can I find out more?

A digest which considers how the long-term contribution of early childhood education to children's performance:
http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/research/themes/early_years/WedMar241201102004/

A digest which considers whether schools counteract early performance differences between children from different social backgrounds:
http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/research/themes/early_years/ThuApr221020482004/

For a more detailed summary of research that investigated the impact of pre-school provision in England on children’s intellectual, social and behavioural development at ages five and seven: http://www.gtce.org.uk/PolicyAndResearch/research/ROMtopics/childrens_schooling/

The Sure Start website offers practitioners links to resources and research about early years education. http://www.surestart.gov.uk/

Pianta, R. C. et al.  (2002)  The relation of kindergarten classroom environment to teacher, family and school characteristics and chid outcomes.  Elementary School Journal 102, 225-238.

 

Back to top^