What can teachers learn from listening to their pupils?
Many teachers are starting to consult their pupils to help them find ways of improving the teaching and learning that goes on in their own classrooms. This study explored the experiences of six teachers and their pupils. The researchers interviewed thirty-six Year 8 pupils individually about three lessons and fed back the pupils’ comments to their teachers. They then interviewed the teachers about their reactions to their pupils’ comments and investigated the use the teachers made of the ideas with their current and subsequent classes.
The researchers found considerable agreement between pupils in their views of teaching and learning. They preferred lessons that were less teacher-led and appreciated interactive teaching that gave them ownership of their learning. They also wanted more opportunities to collaborate with their peers.
The teachers felt that many of their pupils’ ideas were sensible, practical and educationally desirable. Their responses to the pupils’ suggestions fell into three types: two teachers grew increasingly enthusiastic about the benefit of consulting pupils, two experienced success in the short-term, but did not continue to make use of pupil consultation, and two teachers’ experiences of using pupil consultation were unsuccessful.
We think reflecting on these teachers’ experiences will help practitioners consider how they might use pupil consultation to develop their teaching and their pupils’ self-awareness and confidence in their learning.
Keywords:
United Kingdom; Secondary schools; Pupils; Pupil voice; Teaching and learning; Teaching styles
The researchers clustered the pupils’ ideas for what helped then to learn into four main categories.
Interactive teaching for understanding
Pupils wanted to be actively involved in their learning, which meant teachers engaging with what pupils brought to their own learning:
‘If he asked more questions then we’d become more alert instead of just sitting there like, just listening to him all the time’.
‘I thought that we could have done it ourselves if he’d just given us a little bit of help’.
Contextualising the learning
Pupils felt that learning tasks that connected new ideas with something they were already familiar with, especially in unusual ways, helped them to understand and remember the ideas:
‘We’d been learning more about co-ordinates and graphs … and before Easter we learned about ‘squeggs’ … it was an Easter egg – a square Easter egg … So we learned about sides of a squegg and how many squeggs you can get’.
Fostering a stronger sense of ownership
Pupils wanted greater independence in their classroom learning than they were used to. They wanted to be trusted to learn and to have their growing maturity recognised:
‘We just like enjoying writing stuff that we found out ourselves … It’s like really sort of grown-up writing because you have to find information, take notes, then copy it all up’.
Collaborative learning
Pupils valued opportunities to collaborate with their peers – they felt collaboration helped them to express themselves and develop understandings:
‘Like if someone’s had an idea, you can say, “I don’t really think that’ll go”, or “That’ll be really good to what we’re doing”, and when people tell people that, they can say what they think and it just helps you’.
The teachers applied quite demanding criteria to their pupils’ ideas before they would consider using them. Pupils’ suggestions needed to be:
Pupils’ suggestions tended to be acceptable to teachers when they:
For example, one teacher commented:
‘I think one thing that came out was they’d like to discuss wrong results more, which I think is a fair comment really … perhaps I’ll try to make an effort to at least do one piece of investigational work where we spend a lot of time evaluating it and so forth’.
The teachers were also responsive to suggestions that they should not do things that they usually did, or that they should do less of these things, for example talking too much. In a few cases, the teachers felt uncertain about an idea, but suggested that they might try it out:
‘If it’s a disaster, it’s a learning experience for them and it’s a learning experience for me’.
The researchers found the teachers’ responses to their pupils’ suggestions fell into three types.
Short-term success
Two of the teachers had learned from their pupils that they talked too much and both were keen to change their practice. The ideas that they decided to use included increasing practical work, increasing peer collaboration, allowing their pupils to use their initiative more and offering more authentic learning contexts. Both teachers successfully incorporated the pupils’ suggestions into their teaching. But the success was not sustained. Six months later neither teacher felt that they had radically altered the way they taught. Both were concerned that although the approaches had worked, constraints of normal school routines made some of them unrealistic, except perhaps when used at the end of term.
Growing enthusiasm for pupil consultation
The initial experiences of two teachers were unpromising. One found it difficult to incorporate her pupils’ suggestions of including more games and making more use of ICT in her mathematics lessons. Her lessons were unsuccessful because she overestimated her pupils’ ICT knowledge. Another teacher was unimpressed by his pupils’ suggestions because he felt they were predictable – wanting to do more practical work in science lessons etc. Nevertheless, both teachers persisted with developing their teaching in the ways their pupils’ suggested. At the end of the project, the teachers commented that the changes they had made to their teaching had helped improve their pupils’ motivation and sense of responsibility for their own learning. The teachers continued to consult their pupils after the project had finished and were considering encouraging their colleagues to make use of pupil consultation.
Encountering problems with using pupil consultation
Pupil consultation did not work for two teachers. One of these teachers seemed to expect too much of her pupils. She had decided to delegate decision-making to her pupils and tried to make group discussions a central part of the decision-making. Class representatives decided the groups’ membership and led the groups. The activity was unsuccessful – the pupils made clear their dislike of the composition of the groups and the tasks they were given by being hostile to each other. Another teacher was sceptical of her pupils’ suggestions. Although her pupils’ suggestion for more activity-based work and more discussion seemed to work, she was disappointed with her pupils’ apparent lack of effort and the noise level.
The researchers felt that teachers could learn a great deal about pupil consultation from this study. They suggested that, in general, teachers should not feel concerned about giving pupils opportunities to comment on their teaching because the teachers involved in this study noted how:
The researchers indicated that teachers may find dealing with the following issues more demanding:
The study involved six volunteer teachers and their Year 8 classes from three secondary schools – two English, two mathematics and two science teachers. The research was carried out in three stages over one year.
During the first stage (which lasted three months), a researcher interviewed six pupils individually from each class about three lessons. The pupils were chosen by the class teacher and were broadly representative of the class. Transcripts of the interviews were fed back to the teachers and the teachers were interviewed a few days later about their reactions to the pupils’ ideas. The teachers were encouraged to think about the changes they would make to their practice in response to pupil ideas that they judged were worthwhile and manageable. The researchers also clustered the pupil comments into categories and investigated whether there were any noticeable differences between the responses of boys and girls or more successful and less successful learners.
The second phase of the research followed straight after the first and lasted six weeks. The researchers investigated the use that the teachers made of their pupils’ ideas and sought the teachers’ evaluations of what happened.
Finally, each teacher was visited six months later (in the following academic year) to explore whether the teachers were trying the pupils’ ideas with their new class and whether they were consulting pupils about teaching and learning.
In completing this digest, the authors began to ask questions about implications for practitioners.
Teachers may wish to consider the following implications of the findings of this study:
School leaders may find the following implications helpful in acting on the messages in this study:
Further information about the pupil consultation project is available at: www.consultingpupils.co.uk (Accessed 2 August 2005)
The General Teaching Council has a summary of the consulting pupils project illustrated by a number of teacher case studies on its Research of the Month website at: http://www.gtce.org.uk/PolicyAndResearch/research/ROMtopics/pupilvoice/ (Accessed 2 August 2005)
MacBeath, J. et al (2003) Consulting pupils: A toolkit for teachers. Cambridge: Pearson Publishing, (Sample pages are available at:
http://www.pearsonpublishing.co.uk/education/samples/S_498461.pdf) (Accessed 2 August 2005)
The ‘What kids can do’ website has several interesting articles and many useful resources at: http://www.whatkidscando.org/ (Accessed 2 August 2005)
Flutter, J. & Rudduck, J. (2004) Consulting pupils: What’s in it for schools? London: RoutledgeFalmer
Arnot, M., et al (2004) Consultation in the Classroom: Developing Dialogue about Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Pearson Publishing
Forum (43, 2, 2001) was a special issue about pupil voice. It contains a number of interesting accounts by academics, teachers and students. For example, Mitra, D. (2001) ‘Opening the floodgates: giving students a voice in school reform’